Can Clothes Shop Lose Their Wages?

< p style= "text-align: center" > img border= "0" alt= "align=" center "src=" /uploadimages/201312/21/20131221104504_sj.JPG "/" < < > >

< p > in the recent period, Zhuankou's < a target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > clothing < /a > shop lost 67 pieces a target= "_blank" href= "_blank" > clothes < < >, the boss came up with the idea of "equal compensation", allowing more than 30 employees to bear 551 yuan each, so that employees feel very bad.

What kind of story is hidden in it? < /p >

< p > originally, Ms. Li's clothing store opened shortly after, and the staff found that there was a problem in the door anti-theft system, and there was often a malfunction failure, which reflected the situation to the head of the clothing shop, so that clothes were stolen.

Employees feel wronged, the reason and responsibility for losing clothes are unclear. It is unreasonable for everyone to lose money.

< /p >

< p > it is gratifying to note that because of the strong resistance of the staff, the clothing store decided to distribute the deducted money back to the employees and wait for the incident to come out before dealing with it.

< /p >

< p > < strong > under which circumstances can employers deduct laborers < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com//business/" > wages < /a > < /strong > /p >

< p > the employing unit does not ask for the wages of the laborers, which is obviously against the prohibition of the law.

Because according to the Interim Provisions on wage payment, the employing units must pay labor remuneration in full and in time. Unless there is a legal situation, the wages of workers can be withheld, such as the personal income tax payable by workers according to law, the social insurance premiums paid by individual workers, the maintenance or alimony of court judges, and the economic losses caused by laborers themselves.

< /p >

< p > because there are loopholes in the hardware facilities of the employer, and the workers' feedback information is not so popular that they result in theft.

From the perspective of appearance, employers have certain faults, forcing laborers to bear economic losses. There is no legal basis for this. Workers' opinions are unavoidable.

< /p >

< p > < strong > < < a href= > http://sjfzxm.com//business/ > > unit > /a > there is a strict standard for the deduction of wages: no more than 20%. The minimum wage standard is still benchmarking < /strong > /p >

< p > if the investigation is clear and the economic loss is caused by the serious mistakes of individual workers, if the labor contract agrees with the corresponding clauses, the workers can be required to bear the corresponding proportion of damage. However, due to the fault of the employing units, the workers can not demand all the workers to bear the losses, and even the same way can not be used to make the workers pay for the losses.

The deduction of wages to the vital interests of employers and workers has always been a sensitive topic of labor disputes, but it is not a legal forbidden area.

Because the labor contract law and the Interim Provisions on wage payment clearly stipulate that the economic losses caused to the employer are indeed caused by personal reasons such as deliberate or gross negligence. In accordance with the stipulate of the labor contract, workers are required to bear the liability for compensation. The employer can deduct the cost of the loss from the wages of the workers, but it must not exceed 20% of the monthly wages, and the wages paid to the workers must not be lower than the local minimum wage standards.

< /p >